EILMELDUNGEN LIVE
🕵️ SicherheitslückenWhat If Nobody Has Exploited It Yet?(26.08.2026 um 00:00 Uhr)
⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / VirenWhat If Ransomware Never Encrypts Anything?(26.08.2026 um 16:54 Uhr)
🕵️ SicherheitslückenWhat If Nobody Has Exploited It Yet?(26.08.2026 um 00:00 Uhr)
⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / VirenWhat If Ransomware Never Encrypts Anything?(26.08.2026 um 16:54 Uhr)

29 🕛 kürzlich 2 Min Lesezeit 11 Leser online ️ CVE-RADAR
0

Black Hat Asia 2026 | Bad Vibes - Pwning Coding Agents 70 Times With The Same Bugs

↗ Quelle (YouTube · Black Hat)
🗣️ Stimme:
📺
YouTube · Black Hat
4.5k YouTube-Aufrufe
It seems like everyone with access to a keyboard is vibe-coding these days, with an increasingly significant amount of code being written through the use of AI Coding Agents. These tools, whether specialized IDEs, IDE extensions, or CLI utilities, come with varying features, interfaces and architectures. However, they all suffer from the same fundamental, severe vulnerabilities and flawed design choices, which we will expose.
Our research has uncovered 70+ serious vulnerabilities across a broad array of major platforms, including GitHub Copilot, Google Gemini CLI and Antigravity, OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Amazon Q and Kiro, Cursor, and more. These vulnerabilities demonstrate that the industry is collectively making similar, fundamental mistakes in securing these agentic applications, which means that not only coding agents may suffer from similar problems.

In this session, we will first map out what an attacker needs to achieve in order to truly compromise an AI agent. We will present a variety of issues which lead to severe consequences, making coding agents perform actions significantly more devious than just writing terrible code. Come vibe with us as we demonstrate these attacks across multiple products, showing how to turn a successful prompt injection into a devastating machine compromise using various command-line tricks, creative path manipulation techniques, and turning sandbox features against themselves to bypass established defenses.

By detailing the common, critical mistakes shared across these vendors, we aim to provide developers and architects with actionable takeaways to avoid these deep-seated vulnerabilities and better secure the future of AI development tools.

Philip Tsukerman | Vulnerability Research Team Lead, Cyberark
Nil Ashkenazi | Cyber Security Researcher, Cyberark
Alon Zahavi | Senior Security Researcher, Cyberark

https://blackhat.com/asia-26/briefings/schedule/?#bad-vibes---pwning-coding-agents-70-times-with-the-same-bugs-50048
Vollständiger Original-Bericht
Ausführliche Details, Code-Beispiele & Hersteller-Stellungnahme auf youtube.com.
↗ Original-Artikel auf youtube.com lesen
Wie bewertest du diesen Beitrag?
1 Klick Feedback
145 Fachleser & IT-Security Experten haben diesen Report heute geteilt
Teilen mit Netzwerk & Team:

Community-Analysen & Experten-Meinungen 0

Verfasse deine eigene Analyse, teile Workarounds oder diskutiere diesen Vorfall im Blog.
Noch keine Community-Analyse verfasst. Markiere einen Textabschnitt oder klicke oben auf Eigene Analyse verfassen“!
Community Pulse: Relevanz-Einschätzung
1 Klick Experten-Votum
🔴 Akute Relevanz 51%
🟡 In Evaluierung 25%
🟢 Keine Auswirkung 18%
Spannende Innovation 6%
Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)
Port 8095 Engine
2 Quellen
When The Protocol Is The Vulnerability
1 Quelle
What If Ransomware Never Encrypts Anything?
1 Quelle
Hacking All The Devices, with AI? - Rob Allen - PSW #941