Zum Hauptinhalt springen
AI & KI NachrichtenGoogle Cloud Tech: The no-code app implementation plan(29.10.2026 um 20:00 Uhr)
•••
Sichere ProgrammierungStop Blaming Code Review for AI’s Delivery Problem(29.10.2026 um 20:22 Uhr)
••
IT Security NachrichtenCloud Service Models Explained: IaaS vs PaaS vs SaaS(29.10.2026 um 16:39 Uhr)
•••
Sichere ProgrammierungThe offline promise is a test, not a sentence(29.10.2026 um 20:32 Uhr)
••
AI & KI NachrichtenGoogle Cloud Tech: The no-code app implementation plan(29.10.2026 um 20:00 Uhr)
•••
Sichere ProgrammierungStop Blaming Code Review for AI’s Delivery Problem(29.10.2026 um 20:22 Uhr)
••
IT Security NachrichtenCloud Service Models Explained: IaaS vs PaaS vs SaaS(29.10.2026 um 16:39 Uhr)
•••
Sichere ProgrammierungThe offline promise is a test, not a sentence(29.10.2026 um 20:32 Uhr)
••
Intelligence View
⚡ tsecurity.de Intelligence

New CrowdStrike Report Spotlights Agentic AI Campaigns

HD Video
New CrowdStrike Report Spotlights Agentic AI Campaigns
Video abspielen

Video von CrowdStrike auf YouTube: How is the threat landscape looking these days? “A lot is going on,” as Adam puts it. “The speed and the volume of the…

Beitrag
0
Seite
0
↗ Quelle (CrowdStrike)
Social ReaktionenReagiere als Erste:r — dein Feedback zählt!

How is the threat landscape looking these days? “A lot is going on,” as Adam puts it. “The speed and the volume of the activity, everything is on fire.” To illustrate, he shares the Falcon Adversary OverWatch team is now clocking a new agentic adversary every two hours.



A new report from CrowdStrike Counter Adversary Operations puts a spotlight on some of them. The team details four profiles of agentic adversaries, including their targets, operations, and sophistication. Actor 1, believed to operate out of Argentina, is the most advanced and uses a range of AI models including Claude, Sonnet, Opus, and Fable to target healthcare entities. Actor 4, the least sophisticated of the group, is likely a criminal actor operating out of Russia.



In this episode, Adam and Cristian compare and contrast these adversaries. They discuss how they built the harnesses used in their operations, how they handle rejections or guardrails built into AI agents, and how they overcome challenges. Each actor has different methodologies for dealing with the obstacles they face. They also have gaps in their operational security that allow researchers to gain a better idea of how they operate.



Tune in for all the details and check out the full report: https://cs.link/uufrF



📣 Connect With Us:

► LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/crowdstrike

► X:

https://twitter.com/CrowdStrike

► Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/crowdstrike

► Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/crowdstrike



🔔 Subscribe and stay updated!



#CrowdStrike #Cybersecurity #AgenticAI
🔍 CTI & Forensik

Cyber Threat Intelligence & Forensik

ATT&CK-Navigator · IoC-Radar · Exploit-Belege
CTI Threat Relationship Graph
Akteure · Techniken · Beziehungen
2 Knoten · 1 Relationen
CVE / Incident Threat Actor Software MITRE ATT&CK CWE Weakness IoC
Zeka Digest - ücretsiz Günlük en önemli güvenlik haberi · herhangi bir zamanda alınabilir
Community Rating & Social Proof
⭐ Leser-Wertung
–
Ø / 5.0
Hiçbir okuyucu henüz yorum yok
Bu sayfa yararlı mıydı?
0
Jetzt Bewertung abgeben
🟢 Niedrig (1-3.9) 🟡 Mittel (4.0-6.9) 🔴 Hoch (7.0-8.9) Kritisch (9.0-10.0)

İlgili Story Cluster & Kaynaklar (vector AI)

Update to Update
Nächster Beitrag