🪟 Windows TippsGrok for PC: Using xAI’s Chat Assistant On a Bigger Screen(16.09.2026 um 09:33 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsWindows 11 26H2: Release, Neuerungen und wer jetzt handeln muss(16.09.2026 um 09:37 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsGoogle Chrome(16.09.2026 um 08:30 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsGoogle stopft mehrere kritische Chrome-Lücken(16.09.2026 um 09:24 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsKI-Power für eine klare Sprache(16.09.2026 um 08:45 Uhr)
🤖 Android TippsDas Ende einer Ära: Samsung-Nutzer müssen sich umstellen(16.09.2026 um 08:25 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsGrok for PC: Using xAI’s Chat Assistant On a Bigger Screen(16.09.2026 um 09:33 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsWindows 11 26H2: Release, Neuerungen und wer jetzt handeln muss(16.09.2026 um 09:37 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsGoogle Chrome(16.09.2026 um 08:30 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsGoogle stopft mehrere kritische Chrome-Lücken(16.09.2026 um 09:24 Uhr)
🪟 Windows TippsKI-Power für eine klare Sprache(16.09.2026 um 08:45 Uhr)
🤖 Android TippsDas Ende einer Ära: Samsung-Nutzer müssen sich umstellen(16.09.2026 um 08:25 Uhr)

🔧 Programmierung 🕛 vor 1 Monat 4 Min Lesezeit
0

Fetching Instagram Data at Scale in Python: From One Request to Async

↗ Quelle (dev.to)
🗣️ Stimme:
📑 Inhaltsübersicht

I collect Instagram data for <私が収集しているもの・用途 例: hashtag research for my content projects>, and at some point "just call the API in a loop" stopped being fast enough. Here's how I went from a single request to concurrent fetching in Python, using HikerAPI — a REST API for Instagram data (auth is one header, from $0.001/request, 100 free requests to start).






The starting point: one request



Everything begins with a plain synchronous call:




CODE
import requests

headers = {"x-access-key": "YOUR_KEY"}
r = requests.get(
"https://api.hikerapi.com/v2/hashtag/medias/top",
params={"name": "photography"},
headers=headers,
)
print(r.json())






This returns the top posts for a hashtag as JSON. Simple. But if you have <私のボリューム 例: a few hundred hashtags or usernames> to go through, a sequential loop means each request waits for the previous one to finish. At ~0.5–1s per round trip, hundreds of items turn into many minutes of waiting for what is mostly network idle time.






Option 1: threads (smallest change to your code)



Since this is I/O-bound work, ThreadPoolExecutor gets you most of the win with almost no rewrite:




CODE
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
import requests

headers = {"x-access-key": "YOUR_KEY"}
HASHTAGS = ["photography", "travel", "food"] # your list here

def fetch_hashtag(name):
r = requests.get(
"https://api.hikerapi.com/v2/hashtag/medias/top",
params={"name": name},
headers=headers,
timeout=30,
)
r.raise_for_status()
return name, r.json()

with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=10) as pool:
for name, data in pool.map(fetch_hashtag, HASHTAGS):
print(name, len(data))






Ten workers roughly means ten requests in flight at once — a 10x wall-clock speedup on a big list.






Option 2: asyncio + aiohttp (better for large volumes)



For bigger batches I switched to asyncio, mainly because a semaphore makes concurrency control explicit:




CODE
import asyncio
import aiohttp

HEADERS = {"x-access-key": "YOUR_KEY"}
CONCURRENCY = 10

async def fetch_hashtag(session, sem, name):
async with sem:
async with session.get(
"https://api.hikerapi.com/v2/hashtag/medias/top",
params={"name": name},
) as r:
r.raise_for_status()
return name, await r.json()

async def main(hashtags):
sem = asyncio.Semaphore(CONCURRENCY)
async with aiohttp.ClientSession(headers=HEADERS) as session:
tasks = [fetch_hashtag(session, sem, h) for h in hashtags]
return await asyncio.gather(*tasks)

results = asyncio.run(main(["photography", "travel", "food"]))






The semaphore is the important part: without it, gather fires everything at once, which brings us to…






Rate limits: don't hammer the API



A few things I do to stay polite and keep runs stable:





  • Cap concurrency. I stay around 10 in-flight requests. More than that mostly increases error rates, not throughput.


  • Back off on 429/5xx. Retry with exponential backoff instead of failing the whole batch:




CODE
async def fetch_with_retry(session, sem, name, retries=3):
for attempt in range(retries):
try:
return await fetch_hashtag(session, sem, name)
except aiohttp.ClientResponseError as e:
if e.status in (429, 500, 502, 503) and attempt < retries - 1:
await asyncio.sleep(2 ** attempt) # 1s, 2s, 4s
continue
raise








  • Save as you go. At $0.001/request the cost of a batch is small, but re-running a half-failed batch is still wasted money. I write each result to disk (JSONL) as it arrives, so a crash only re-fetches what's missing.






Takeaway




  • One-off calls: plain requests is fine.

  • Hundreds of items: ThreadPoolExecutor, 10 workers, done in minutes.

  • Ongoing/large collection: asyncio + semaphore + retry, writing results incrementally.



The nice thing about having Instagram data behind a plain REST API is that all the usual Python concurrency patterns just work — no session juggling or scraper babysitting.



How do you handle batch collection in your projects — threads or asyncio? And what concurrency do you find APIs generally tolerate?






Disclosure: this post is part of HikerAPI's reward program (rewarded in API credits). The code and workflow are my own.

Vollständiger Original-Artikel
Den kompletten Beitrag mit allen Details direkt auf dev.to lesen.
↗ Original-Artikel auf dev.to lesen
Wie bewertest du diesen Beitrag?
1 Klick Feedback
Teilen mit Netzwerk & Team:

Community-Analysen & Experten-Meinungen 0

Verfasse deine eigene Analyse, teile Workarounds oder diskutiere diesen Vorfall im Blog.
Noch keine Community-Analyse verfasst. Markiere einen Textabschnitt oder klicke oben auf Eigene Analyse verfassen“!
Community Pulse: Relevanz-Einschätzung
1 Klick Experten-Votum
🔴 Akute Relevanz 0%
🟡 In Evaluierung 0%
🟢 Keine Auswirkung 0%
Spannende Innovation 0%
Verwandte Story-Cluster & Quellen (Vektor-KI)
Port 8095 Engine
1 Quelle
Grok for PC: Using xAI’s Chat Assistant On a Bigger Screen
1 Quelle
Windows 11 26H2: Release, Neuerungen und wer jetzt handeln muss
1 Quelle
WMF-Messerblock mit 7 Teilen kostet bei Amazon aktuell deutlich weniger
Ähnliche Beiträge
🔍 Verwandte News

Auch interessante Nachrichten Fetching Instagram Data at Scale in Python: From One Request to Async

Thematisch verwandte Begriffe: Fetching, Instagram, Data, Scale · 6 Treffer

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...

Laden...

Beiträge werden geladen ...

Laden...

Videos werden geladen ...